It is well known that online IQ tests, basic tests like the Raven, the entrance test for that international society known for grouping high-IQ individuals at the 98th percentile, the old test downloadable online for entry into that other organization recognized for its intelligence tests requiring a 99.9th percentile, or tests from societies that invent their own, cannot be considered reliable for determining someone's IQ.
We spoke with a group of scientists from various countries, and the opinion is unanimous and quite obvious: an IQ test that takes more than one day, supervised, and scientifically validated will be far more accurate than any quick or unsupervised online test. Moreover, societies whose tests are created by pseudo-psychometrists, who operate as impostors, should also be investigated.
One of the qualities of gifted individuals is a strong sense of justice; thus, it's not logical for someone to self-identify as gifted without having taken at least one Wechsler Scale test, for example. Refusing to take the test can also be seen as suspicious.
Some claim that the type of test isn't suitable, but that's not the case. If someone takes one IQ test, they should be able to take others, since if intelligence is indeed extraordinary, it would allow a person to excel in any test; otherwise, they wouldn't truly be intelligent. Intelligence lies in versatility, adaptability, and the ability to do anything and everything.
Therefore, aiming to uphold a sense of justice, not to allow impostors to prevail, and to reveal the truth about its members to maintain credibility and trust as a high-IQ society, the IIS Society no longer accepts tests that are not supervised, administered by qualified specialists, ensuring that the IQ disclosed in its report is genuine and a matter of pride.